Most recent post

Mindanao university ordered to close law programs

  The Legal Education Board (LEB) has ordered the Mindanao State University to close its law programs in all its campuses starting academic year 2025-2026 after it approved a resolution canceling MSU’s accreditation. The order stemmed from MSU’s refusal to recognize LEB’s supervisory authority and for asserting that it is not bound by the board’s orders, policies and guidelines on legal education. “The MSU is no longer authorized to offer the basic law program in the country,”  the LEB said. The board made permanent the cease and desist order it issued against MSU’s extension law programs on its campuses in Tawi-Tawi, Sulu and Maguindanao. It expressed concern over what it described as MSU’s “dismal” performance in the Bar examinations, noting the school’s passing rate since 2013 has been below the national passing percentage. Reacting to the LEB’s resolution, the MSU said it would continue to operate in accordance with its chapter passed by Congress in 1955. “The LEB cannot act no

SC Upholds Constitutionality of TRAIN Act




The Supreme Court En Banc, during its session on Tuesday, January 24, 2023, upheld the constitutionality of R.A. No. 10963, or the Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion Act (TRAIN Act), which amended R.A. No. 8424, or the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997. 


[Highlights] Thirteen Justices voted to dismiss the petitions, one dissented, while the other took no part: 


• The Court held that the supposed absence of a quorum was belied by the official Journal of the House of Representatives [...] As [between] the livestream video and photographs presented by the petitioners, [and] the Congressional Journal, the [latter] must [prevail] as to the events on the Congressional floor on that fateful day given that no less than the Constitution itself grants the Congressional Journal its imprimatur; 


• That the Constitution, in its present form, does not prohibit the imposition of regressive taxes, but merely directs Congress to evolve a progressive system of taxation; 


• That petitioners’ contention that the provisions of the TRAIN Act are “anti-poor,” was not sufficiently proven and remained largely hypothetical. 


The Supreme Court Public Information Office will upload the decision to the Supreme Court website once it receives an official copy from the Office of the Clerk of Court En Banc. (Courtesy of the Supreme Court Public Information Office). 


Read the full summary here:

https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/32655/

If you believe this Website/Page has helped you with your legal studies and keeping up with current events, please consider supporting us by clicking ads once a day.

This is how our Pages work and how we will continue to provide valuable content related to laws and jurisprudence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2024 BAR SYLLABUS | Office of Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez

SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO 2023 BAR EXAMS ON CRIMINAL LAW

Q. No. 2 | Political Law | Suggested Answer | Bar 2023