Viral β€˜past tense’ challenge video raises education concerns

-

 

✍️ Jeline Malasig 
Provided by Interaksyon
Viral ‘past tense’ challenge video raises education concerns

Concerns were raised about education after a viral TikTok clip showed a group of young people failing to give correct answers to tense-related questions. 

TikTok user @dash_in_sgp recently reposted a video of some young people taking part in a "Past Challenge," in which they must give the past tense of a verb in a limited amount of time. If they get it right, they receive a cash prize.


If they did not give the correct answer, their faces had to be dipped in loose powder in front of them.


The young people were initially asked to give the past tense of β€œsay” but many got it wrong. 

Some of their answers were β€œsaying,” β€œwill say” and β€œhello.” 

They were also asked to give the past tense of β€œring” but some answered β€œringed” and β€œringing.” 

Other verbs that received wrong answers are β€œlead,” β€œmake,” β€œvisit,” β€œplay,” β€œdance,” β€œstudy,” β€œgo,” β€œtake,” β€œsit,” β€œdrink” and β€œhide.” 


A University of the Philippines student also found the video β€œvery alarming.” 


β€œNakakagulat din na most of them, hindi alam ang past tense ng words, or maging ang kahulugan ng past tense. (Ex. One of the kids said that the past tense of play is playing, while say is hello.),” Juan Laurenz Dela Cruz, a former student organization president, said on Facebook.


β€œChallenge: Past tense for happy kids,” a text from the video reads. 

WATCH πŸ“½οΈ


Read more:

https://interaksyon.philstar.com/trends-spotlights/2023/01/27/241333/viral-past-tense-challenge-video-raises-concerns-education/ 

If you believe this Website/Page has helped you with your legal studies and keeping up with current events, please consider supporting us by clicking ads once a day.

This is how our Pages work and how we will continue to provide valuable content related to laws and jurisprudence.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

π„πœπ¨π§π¨π¦π’πœ π‘πžπšπ₯𝐒𝐭𝐲 π“πžπ¬π­.

-
Image
  π„πœπ¨π§π¨π¦π’πœ π‘πžπšπ₯𝐒𝐭𝐲 π“πžπ¬π­. [G.R. No. 189255 June 17, 2015]  "Aside from the control test, the Supreme Court has also used the economic reality test in determining whether an employer-employee relationship exists between the parties."  "Under this test, the economic realities prevailing within the activity or between the parties are examined, taking into consideration the [totality of circumstances] surrounding the true nature of the relationship between the parties." In Sevilla v. Court of Appeals, we observed the need to consider the existing economic conditions prevailing between the parties, in addition to the standard of right-of-control [...] to give a clearer picture in determining the existence of an employer-employee relationship based on an analysis of the totality of economic circumstances of the worker.  Thus, the determination of the relationship between employer and employee depends upon the circumstances of the whole economic activi...
Read more

SC applied the "economic dependency test" and ruled a Lazada delivery rider as a regular employee.

-
Image
  ANTECEDENTS   In February 2016, Chrisden Cabrera Ditiangkin, Hendrix Masamayor Molines,5 Harvey Mosquito Juanio, Joselito Castro Verde, and Brian Anthony Cubacub Nabong (collectively, riders) were hired as riders by Lazada E-Services Philippines, Inc. (Lazada). They were primarily tasked to pick up items from sellers and deliver them to Lazada's warehouse. Each of them signed an Independent Contractor Agreement (Contract) which states that they will be paid P1,200.00 per day as service fee. Respondents maintain that the Contract they signed with petitioners explicitly states that there is no employer-employee relationship between them. SC RULING   When the status of the employment is in dispute, the employer bears the burden to prove that the person whose service it pays for is an independent contractor rather than a regular employee with or without fixed terms. SPONSORED   Bar Q&A (2024 Ed.) Law Questions Criminal Commercial Civil Political Labor Taxation Ethi...
Read more

SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO 2023 BAR EXAMS ON CRIMINAL LAW

-
Image
  SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO 2023 BAR EXAMS ON CRIMINAL LAW BY JUDGE Marlo Campanilla 1. Court has jurisdiction - Extra-territoriality and generality principle ( 8-Hrs video Speed Lecture and regular review lecture )  2. Joey can invoke mistake of fact in relation of death under exceptional circumstance (last-minute video lecture, 8-hrs speed video lecture, pre-week video lecture, regular lecture) 3. Kidnapping with homicide , Ramos and Mercado principle (last-minute video lecture, pre-week video lecture, 8-hrs video speed lecture, regular lecture) 4. Aggravating circumstance of committing a crime in the present of the President; nighttime is not aggravating circumstance (Basic principle) 5. Ado is liable (Basic principle)   6. Pardon will not remit accessory penalty (8-hrs speed video lecture, pre-week video lecture, regular lecture) 7. The duration of reclusion perpetua is 40 years ( Miguel vs. Director of Bureau Prisons, UDK-15368, September 15, 2021 ) 8. Treason is...
Read more