S.A 2020/21 B.E LABOR LAW | Question #14
![]() |
Neuro Brain & Focus 60ct, Healthy Memory Function, Clarity Nootropic Supplement |
SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO THE 2020/21 BAR EXAMINATIONS IN LABOR LAW
#LaborLaw #PreviousBarQuestions
Upon the owner’s instructions, the restaurant manager served a notice of termination on a cashier who has been employed in that restaurant for more than five years. Effective immediately, the notice was based on the alleged insubordination of the cashier.
The owner had ordered the termination immediately after learning from the manager that the cashier was asking whether the restaurant was remitting Social Security System contributions deducted from employees’ salaries.
Will an action for illegal dismissal filed by the cashier prosper? Explain briefly.
Ads.
![]() |
POLITICAL LAW Bar Q&A (2023 Ed.) - Political Law - Carlo Cruz - Questions and Answers 🛒 LZD: https://go.shopple.co/splbia 🛒SHP: https://invl.io/clggpx7 REMEDIAL LAW Bar Q&A (2023 Ed.) - Remedial Law - Prof. Manuel Riguera - Central - Questions and Answers 🛒LZD: https://go.shopple.co/splbid 🛒 SHP: https://invl.io/clggpyr LABOR LAW Bar Q&A (2023 Ed.) - Labor Law - Benedict Guirey Kato - Questions and Answers - Central 🛒LZD: https://go.shopple.co/splbif 🛒SHP: https://invl.io/clggq2e ETHICS Bar Q&A (2023 Ed.) - Legal Ethics - Ed Vincent Albano - Questions and Answers 🛒LZD: https://go.shopple.co/splbih 🛒 SHP: https://invl.io/clggpur CIVIL LAW Bar Q&A (2023 Ed.) - Civil Law - Vivian Paguirigan - Central - Questions and Answers 🛒LZD: https://go.shopple.co/splbii 🛒 SHP: https://invl.io/clggpyr CRIMINAL LAW Bar Q&A (2023 Ed.) - Criminal Law - Judge Ma. Rowena Alejandria - Central - Questions and Answers 🛒LZD: https://go.shopple.co/splbil 🛒SHP: https://invl.io/clggq1b COMMERCIAL LAW Bar Q&A (2023 Ed.) - Commercial Law - Dean Nilo Divina - Central - Questions and Answers 🛒LZD: https://go.shopple.co/splbin 🛒 SHP: https://invl.io/clggpwf |
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Yes, the action for illegal dismissal will prosper. The dismissal of the cashier was made without complying with substantive and procedural due process and therefore violates the cashier’s right to security of tenure.
There is no substantive due process because his dissociation as a regular employee is not for a just or authorized cause. In particular, making inquiries as to whether the restaurant was remitting SSS premiums does not constitute insubordination because it does not meet the elements of insubordination under Sec. 5.2(b) of the DOLE Department Order No. 147 s. 2015.
Finally, there is no procedural due proces because the employer did not comply with the “twin notice” requirement before dismissing the cashier under Art. 292 of the Labor Code.
Code: S.A 2020/21 B.E LABOR LAW | Question #14
MORE:
WEBSITE:
📎 https://bit.ly/m/AttyEblogger
Visit 🔎 "Previous Bar Questions"
Shopple Store 🛒
📎 https://shopple.co/Lex-curiae
Visit 🔎 "Previous Bar Questions"
•Telegram
• Discord
Sponsored by GoDaddy.com
Please click bait to support 😘🤘
ReplyDelete