S.A 2020/21 B.E POLITICAL LAW | Question #
SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO THE 2020/21 BAR EXAMINATIONS IN POLITICAL* LAW #POLI* Law #PreviousBarQuestions Code: S.A 2020/21 B.E POLITICAL* LAW | Question #05 |
SHOP HERE |
BAR QUESTION
Both the House of Representatives and the Senate passed a bill which:
SHOP HERE |
(a) increases the.number of Supreme Court Justices from 15 to 20;
SHOP HERE VOL. I VOL. II |
(b) assigns the five most senior Justices, including the Chief Justice, exclusively to a Special Division that will tackle only constitutional cases; and
SHOP HERE |
(c) removes from the Supreme Court En Banc the power to hear and decide cases involving alleged violations of the Constitution.
SHOP HERE! |
The Chief Presidential Legal Counsel advises the President to veto the bill, arguing that the law is unconstitutional because its contents should be the subject of constitutional amendment rather than of legislation.
Bye mosquito SHOP HERE |
Is the Chief Presidential Legal Counsel's argument constitutionally sound? Explain briefly.
SHOP HERE |
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
7 in 1 Premium Maca Root Capsules na may Premium Ginseng, Tribulus, at Higit Pa 8050 mgEq - Natural Energy, Performance at Mood Support - 120 Capsules SHOP HERE! |
The Presidential Legal Counsel’s advice is not exactly constitutionally sound.
BBM BUWIS BAYARAN MO SHIRT SHOP HERE! |
As to (a), the PLC is correct that this should be the subject of constitutional amendment rather than of legislation because the Constitution expressly provides that the Supreme Court shall be composed of a Chief Justice and fourteen Associate Justices; therefore, increasing the number of Justices from 15 to 20 requires constitutional amendment.
adult magazine SHOP HERE |
As to (b) and (c), however, the PLC is not exactly correct that.these matters could be the subject of constitutional amendment because said provisions seek to disrupt the basic architecture of a democratic and republican form of government, which is founded on separation of powers and its corollary doctrine of checks and balances.
SHOP HERE |
This is obvious with respect to (b) and (C) of the bill which, if approved, would wreak havoc on the bedrock of checks and balances; thus, they could not be achieved through mere constitutional amendment.
SHOP HERE |
SHOP HERE |
SHOP HERE |
2023 Bar Exam Quiz Cards Reviewer for ₱150 - ₱500. |
▶️ Watch here |
"The series that made thousands of lawyers." SHOP HERE |
LAW BOOK FLAGS / FILING TABS
Bhe, para hindi kana malito, at madali mo siyang mahanap? Lagyan natin ng color ang buhay mo? Este ang books mo? |
Shop here: https://go.shopple.co/spm01i More @ https://shopple.co/Lex-curiae Visit "Bar techniques" : Abubot ni atorni |
SHOP HERE |
Watch HERE |
SHOP HERE |
SHOP HERE |
SHOP HERE MORE designs HERE |
Now is the time to upgrade your study table and establish a study environment. SHOP HERE! LZD: https://s.lazada.com.ph/s.6KeIS?cc SHP: https://go.shopple.co/spn8co |
No more overheating! SHOP HERE! LZD: https://s.lazada.com.ph/s.6KTde?cc SHP: https://go.shopple.co/spn8bx |
Phone screen cleaner SHOP HERE! |
SHOP HERE |
SHOP HERE |
FOLLOW US! for more BAR Q-&-A 🛒 https://shopple.co/Lex-curiae ▶️ https://youtube.com/@attyphiljuris 🌐 https://bit.ly/m/AttyEblogger 🛩️ https://t.me/phiLJuris |
Comments
Post a Comment