S.A 2020/21 B.E POLITICAL LAW | Question #

     



SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO THE 2020/21 BAR EXAMINATIONS IN POLITICAL* LAW 
#POLI* Law #PreviousBarQuestions 
Code: S.A 2020/21 B.E POLITICAL* LAW | Question #05

SHOP HERE


BAR QUESTION


Both the House of Representatives and the Senate passed a bill which: 

SHOP HERE


(a) increases the.number of Supreme Court Justices from 15 to 20; 

SHOP HERE
VOL. I
VOL. II

(b) assigns the five most senior Justices, including the Chief Justice, exclusively to a Special Division that will tackle only constitutional cases; and 



SHOP HERE


(c) removes from the Supreme Court En Banc the power to hear and decide cases involving alleged violations of the Constitution.


SHOP HERE!



The Chief Presidential Legal Counsel advises the President to veto the bill, arguing that the law is unconstitutional because its contents should be the subject of constitutional amendment rather than of legislation.


Bye mosquito
SHOP HERE


Is the Chief Presidential Legal Counsel's argument constitutionally sound? Explain briefly.



SHOP HERE

SUGGESTED ANSWER:


7 in 1 Premium Maca Root Capsules na may Premium Ginseng, Tribulus, at Higit Pa 8050 mgEq - Natural Energy, Performance at Mood Support - 120 Capsules
SHOP HERE!


The Presidential Legal Counsel’s advice is not exactly constitutionally sound. 



BBM BUWIS BAYARAN MO SHIRT
SHOP HERE!



As to (a), the PLC is correct that this should be the subject of constitutional amendment rather than of legislation because the Constitution expressly provides that the Supreme Court shall be composed of a Chief Justice and fourteen Associate Justices; therefore, increasing the number of Justices from 15 to 20 requires constitutional amendment. 


adult magazine
SHOP HERE


As to (b) and (c), however, the PLC is not exactly correct that.these matters could be the subject of constitutional amendment because said provisions seek to disrupt the basic architecture of a democratic and republican form of government, which is founded on separation of powers and its corollary doctrine of checks and balances.


SHOP HERE



  This is obvious with respect to (b) and (C) of the bill which, if approved, would wreak havoc on the bedrock of checks and balances; thus, they could not be achieved through mere constitutional amendment.



SHOP HERE


  What are your thoughts on the suggested answer? Please leave your suggestions in the comments section at the bottom of this article. Thanks! 


SHOP HERE


SHOP HERE

  

2023 Bar Exam Quiz Cards Reviewer for ₱150 - ₱500.



  

   

▶️ Watch here




"The series that made thousands of lawyers."
SHOP HERE


LAW BOOK FLAGS / FILING TABS


Bhe, para hindi kana malito, at madali mo siyang mahanap? 🤔
Lagyan natin ng color 🌈 ang buhay mo? Este ang books 📚 mo?



🛒
 Shop here: https://go.shopple.co/spm01i
More @ https://shopple.co/Lex-curiae
Visit 🔎 "Bar techniques"
📸Abubot ni atorni













SHOP HERE




Watch HERE





SHOP HERE




SHOP HERE





SHOP HERE
MORE designs HERE



Now is the time to upgrade your study table and establish a study environment.
🛒 SHOP HERE!
LZD: https://s.lazada.com.ph/s.6KeIS?cc
SHP: https://go.shopple.co/spn8co


No more overheating!
🛒 SHOP HERE!
LZD: https://s.lazada.com.ph/s.6KTde?cc
SHP: https://go.shopple.co/spn8bx




Phone screen cleaner
🛒 SHOP HERE!






Save time and write with confidence.
QuillBot is a paraphrasing and summarizing tool that helps millions of students and professionals cut their writing time by more than half using state-of-the-art AI to rewrite any sentence, paragraph, or article.




SHOP HERE





SHOP HERE








FOLLOW US!
for more BAR Q-&-A

🛒 https://shopple.co/Lex-curiae
▶️ https://youtube.com/@attyphiljuris
🌐 https://bit.ly/m/AttyEblogger
🛩️ https://t.me/phiLJuris





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2024 BAR SYLLABUS | Office of Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez

Q. No. 2 | Political Law | Suggested Answer | Bar 2023

SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO 2023 BAR EXAMS ON CRIMINAL LAW