Most recent post

Mindanao university ordered to close law programs

  The Legal Education Board (LEB) has ordered the Mindanao State University to close its law programs in all its campuses starting academic year 2025-2026 after it approved a resolution canceling MSU’s accreditation. The order stemmed from MSU’s refusal to recognize LEB’s supervisory authority and for asserting that it is not bound by the board’s orders, policies and guidelines on legal education. “The MSU is no longer authorized to offer the basic law program in the country,”  the LEB said. The board made permanent the cease and desist order it issued against MSU’s extension law programs on its campuses in Tawi-Tawi, Sulu and Maguindanao. It expressed concern over what it described as MSU’s “dismal” performance in the Bar examinations, noting the school’s passing rate since 2013 has been below the national passing percentage. Reacting to the LEB’s resolution, the MSU said it would continue to operate in accordance with its chapter passed by Congress in 1955. “The LEB cannot act no

𝐄𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭.

 


𝐄𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭.

[G.R. No. 189255 June 17, 2015] 


"Aside from the control test, the Supreme Court has also used the economic reality test in determining whether an employer-employee relationship exists between the parties." 


"Under this test, the economic realities prevailing within the activity or between the parties are examined, taking into consideration the [totality of circumstances] surrounding the true nature of the relationship between the parties."


In Sevilla v. Court of Appeals, we observed the need to consider the existing economic conditions prevailing between the parties, in addition to the standard of right-of-control [...] to give a clearer picture in determining the existence of an employer-employee relationship based on an analysis of the totality of economic circumstances of the worker. 


Thus, the determination of the relationship between employer and employee depends upon the circumstances of the whole economic activity, such as: 


(1) the extent to which the services performed are an integral part of the employer’s business; 


(2) the extent of the worker’s investment in equipment and facilities; 


(3) the nature and degree of control exercised by the employer; 


(4) the worker’s opportunity for profit and loss; 


(5) the amount of initiative, skill, judgment or foresight required for the success of the claimed independent enterprise; 


(6) the permanency and duration of the relationship between the worker and the employer; and 


(7) the degree of dependency of the worker upon the employer for his continued employment in that line of business. 


The proper standard of economic dependence is whether the worker is dependent on the alleged employer for his continued employment in that line of business. 


Full text:

📎 https://pste.link/2sj9qbqd

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2024 BAR SYLLABUS | Office of Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez

SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO 2023 BAR EXAMS ON CRIMINAL LAW

Q. No. 2 | Political Law | Suggested Answer | Bar 2023