Most recent post

Mindanao university ordered to close law programs

  The Legal Education Board (LEB) has ordered the Mindanao State University to close its law programs in all its campuses starting academic year 2025-2026 after it approved a resolution canceling MSU’s accreditation. The order stemmed from MSU’s refusal to recognize LEB’s supervisory authority and for asserting that it is not bound by the board’s orders, policies and guidelines on legal education. “The MSU is no longer authorized to offer the basic law program in the country,”  the LEB said. The board made permanent the cease and desist order it issued against MSU’s extension law programs on its campuses in Tawi-Tawi, Sulu and Maguindanao. It expressed concern over what it described as MSU’s “dismal” performance in the Bar examinations, noting the school’s passing rate since 2013 has been below the national passing percentage. Reacting to the LEB’s resolution, the MSU said it would continue to operate in accordance with its chapter passed by Congress in 1955. “The LEB cannot act no

When a person violates a Regulation that imposes a fine or community service, arrest is not proper.

 



When a person violates a Regulation that imposes a fine or community service, arrest is not proper. Therefore, there could be no search incidental to a lawful arrest [.]


Examples:

(i) Violation of city or municipal ordinance;

(ii) Under R.A. 4136, or the Land Transportation and Traffic Code, the general procedure for dealing with a trafficviolation is [not] the arrest of the offender, [but] the confiscation of the driver’s license of the latter or issue a corresponding ticket as the case may be[.]


To protect the people from unreasonable searches and seizures, Section 3(2), Article III of the 1987 Constitution providesthat evidence obtained from unreasonable searches and seizures shall be inadmissible in evidence for any purpose in any proceeding. In other words, evidence obtained and confiscated on the occasion of such unreasonable searches and seizures are deemed tainted and should be [excluded] for being the proverbial fruit of a poisonous tree[.]


[...] the law requires that there [first] be a lawful arrest [before] a search can be made — the process cannot be reversed.


RAMON PICARDAL y BALUYOT, petitioner, vs. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, respondent.

G.R. No. 235749. June 19, 2019

⚖️👨‍⚖️ 𝗖𝗔𝗚𝗨𝗜𝗢𝗔, 𝗝

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2024 BAR SYLLABUS | Office of Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez

SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO 2023 BAR EXAMS ON CRIMINAL LAW

Q. No. 2 | Political Law | Suggested Answer | Bar 2023